KNOXVILLE, Tenn. — The former Knox County Governmental librarian was indicted by a grand jury after a Tennessee Comptroller investigation revealed she was paid over $100,000 for time she did not work.
Ashley Satterfield received at least $108,444 in compensation for time not working between 2014 and her resignation on Jan. 27, 2023.
Investigators conducted interviews and reviewed documentation including identification badge entry and exit activity to conclude that Satterfield wasn't working on many days. For example, in July 2022, she received a full month's pay. However, records show that she was only physically present at the library for approximately one hour that month, the Tennessee Comptroller's Office said.
An additional $40,527 of Satterfield's compensation was also questioned. Although she was not authorized to work remotely, she claimed she worked from home periodically—specifically on days when she worked at the library for less than a full workday. Investigators couldn't determine whether she earned the total compensation paid on these days.
Knox County had conducted an internal review and then turned over its findings about Satterfield to the Comptroller's Office.
Satterfield was indicted on one count of theft over $60,000 and on one count of official misconduct, according to Knox County Criminal Court records.
"Ms. Satterfield served with distinction for years, and should not be the butt of unsubstantiated criticisms and charges. As a very base salary range Knox County employee, it is concerning to see this lady attacked in such a manner, especially at the Holiday Season," T. Scott Jones, Satterfield's attorney, said to 10News.
“Knox County officials should ensure that requirements related to completing and submitting time sheets are followed,” Tennessee Comptroller Jason Mumpower said. “In this case, Satterfield did not complete timesheets or document any annual or sick leave that she may have taken. Additionally, the library should be issuing prenumbered receipts when it collects money. Due to the lack of receipts, investigators could not determine if all the library funds were accounted for and deposited.”